Back to all case studies

Nurturing Future Engineers: Meta Dot RC Car Challenge Empowers Holm Glad College STEAM Tech Day

Meta Dot team collaborated with Holm Glad College to organize an RC car challenge, where 120 Form 1 students explored mechanical engineering and physics principles through hands-on modification and racing

RC CarSTEAM EducationEngineeringYouth Innovation
Nurturing Future Engineers: Meta Dot RC Car Challenge Empowers Holm Glad College STEAM Tech Day
Full-day activity
Secondary School
Challenge Competition, STEAM DAY
Single Session

Skills

Mechanical EngineeringPhysics PrinciplesProblem-SolvingTeamworkStrategic Thinking
2025-05-09

Program Overview

Program Name: RC Car Engineering Challenge Program
Duration: 16 weeks (4 months)
Partner School: The Mission Covenant Church Holm Glad College
Target Students: 120 Form 1 students

Educational Objectives & Learning Outcomes

Primary Learning Objectives

  1. Mechanical Engineering Fundamentals - Understanding vehicle structure, power systems, and control principles
  2. Physics Applications - Mastering mechanics, kinematics, and electrical engineering in practical engineering contexts
  3. Problem-solving Skills - Developing systematic thinking and innovative solution design
  4. Team Collaboration - Building effective communication and project management skills
  5. Technology Literacy - Enhancing understanding and application of modern engineering technologies

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Ability to independently assemble and tune RC vehicles
  • Understanding of basic mechanical engineering principles applied to real problems
  • Basic circuit analysis and troubleshooting capabilities
  • Ability to use data analysis to improve vehicle performance
  • Development of teamwork and project management skills

Curriculum Structure Design

Phase 1: Theoretical Foundation (Weeks 1-4)

Week 1: Introduction to Mechanical Engineering

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Engineering design process, basic mechanical principles
  • Activities: Engineering case analysis, design thinking workshop

Week 2: Vehicle Systems Overview

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Chassis structure, drivetrain systems, suspension systems
  • Activities: Vehicle disassembly analysis, component function identification

Week 3: Electronic Control Systems

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Motor principles, circuit fundamentals, control signals
  • Activities: Basic circuit experiments, controller programming introduction

Week 4: Physics Principles Application

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Newton's laws, friction, centripetal force
  • Activities: Mechanics experiments, data collection and analysis

Phase 2: Practical Operations (Weeks 5-12)

Weeks 5-6: Basic Assembly

  • Class Time: 4 sessions (180 minutes)
  • Content: Chassis assembly, motor installation, circuit connections
  • Activities: Group assembly competitions, troubleshooting practice

Weeks 7-8: Performance Tuning

  • Class Time: 4 sessions (180 minutes)
  • Content: Gear ratio adjustment, center of gravity configuration, tire selection
  • Activities: Performance testing, data recording and analysis

Weeks 9-10: Advanced Modifications

  • Class Time: 4 sessions (180 minutes)
  • Content: Shock absorber adjustment, aerodynamics, battery management
  • Activities: Personalized modifications, innovative design implementation

Weeks 11-12: Testing and Optimization

  • Class Time: 4 sessions (180 minutes)
  • Content: Track adaptation, strategy formulation, team training
  • Activities: Mock competitions, team role assignments

Phase 3: Field Study (Week 13)

Factory Visit & Professional Exchange

  • Duration: Full day (6 hours)
  • Location: Local automotive manufacturing plant
  • Content: Production line tour, engineer discussions, career planning sharing
  • Objective: Understanding practical applications of engineering technology in industry

Ready

Phase 4: Comprehensive Application (Weeks 14-16)

Week 14: Project Preparation

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Final tuning, strategy discussions, safety checks
  • Activities: Vehicle certification, technical documentation

Week 15: Competition Practice

  • Duration: Full-day competition (8 hours)
  • Format: Dual-track challenge race
  • Assessment: Technical performance, teamwork, innovative design

Week 16: Results Presentation & Reflection

  • Class Time: 2 sessions (90 minutes)
  • Content: Project summary, learning reflection, future planning
  • Activities: Results presentation, experience sharing

Teaching Methods & Strategies

Constructivist Learning Approach

  • Learning by Doing - Mastering theoretical knowledge through hands-on practice
  • Problem-based Learning - Driving learning through real engineering challenges
  • Peer Collaboration - Group cooperation to complete complex tasks

Project-Based Learning (PBL)

  • Real Problems - Course design based on actual engineering challenges
  • Interdisciplinary Integration - Combining physics, mathematics, technology, and engineering
  • Self-directed Learning - Fostering students' initiative to explore

Experiential Learning

  • Field Studies - Visiting professional engineering facilities
  • Expert Guidance - Inviting industry experts to share experiences
  • Competition Challenges - Motivating learning through competition

Resource Allocation & Logistics

Human Resources

  • Lead Instructors: 2 (Meta Dot Senior Engineers)
  • Assistant Instructors: 4 (Technical Support Specialists)
  • School Liaisons: 2 (Science Department Teachers)
  • Safety Supervisors: 1 (Laboratory Technician)

Equipment & Materials

  • RC Car Kits: 30 sets (4 students per group)
  • Tool Equipment: Screwdriver sets, measuring tools, soldering equipment
  • Testing Equipment: Stopwatches, rulers, voltmeters, ammeters
  • Safety Equipment: Safety goggles, gloves, first aid kits

Venue Arrangements

  • Theory Classroom: Multimedia classroom (capacity 120 students)
  • Workshop Space: Science laboratories × 4 rooms
  • Testing Venue: School hall (competition arena)
  • Storage Space: Dedicated equipment room

Fixing

Assessment Framework

Formative Assessment (60%)

  • Class Participation: 15% - Discussion engagement, question quality
  • Practical Skills: 25% - Assembly techniques, problem-solving abilities
  • Teamwork: 20% - Collaborative spirit, leadership qualities

Summative Assessment (40%)

  • Technical Report: 15% - Design concepts, data analysis
  • Competition Performance: 15% - Vehicle performance, strategy execution
  • Innovative Design: 10% - Unique modifications, creative thinking

Assessment Tools

  • Learning Portfolio - Recording learning progress and reflections
  • Peer Assessment Forms - Team members evaluating each other
  • Self-Assessment Scales - Self-evaluation of learning outcomes
  • Practical Skills Checklists - Objective assessment of technical abilities

Safety Management Protocol

Safety Training

  • Tool Usage Safety - Proper operation procedure training
  • Electrical Safety - Circuit operation precautions
  • Chemical Safety - Battery handling safety guidelines

Safety Measures

  • Supervision Ratio - 1:15 teacher-student ratio ensuring safety
  • Protective Equipment - Mandatory safety gear wearing
  • Emergency Plans - Accident response procedures

Hand Up

Program Results & Impact

Learning Effectiveness Data

  • Skills Mastery Rate: 95% of students met basic assembly requirements
  • Theoretical Understanding: Average test scores improved by 35%
  • Innovation Capability: 85% of students proposed unique design improvements
  • Teamwork: 100% of students completed group projects

Student Feedback

"Through this program, I truly understood for the first time how physics formulas from textbooks apply in real life. Seeing the car I personally tuned racing on the track - that sense of achievement is indescribable!" - Form 1A student

"The most memorable part was the teamwork process. We learned how to divide tasks, how to communicate, and how to support each other when facing technical problems. These skills are important for our future." - Form 1B student

Teacher Evaluation

"Students showed unprecedented learning enthusiasm in this program. They no longer passively receive knowledge but actively explore, question, and experiment. This is exactly what modern education pursues." - Science Department Head

Competition Results

Technical Innovation Awards

Total Laps Champion: Form 1A "Speed Gear" Team (40 laps)

Champion

Best Innovative Design: Form 1C "Tech Pioneer" Team (Detachable modular design)

Best Teamwork: Form 1B "Perfect Coordination" Team (Seamless task division)

Technical Track Fastest Lap: Form 1D "Storm Chasers" (15.41 seconds)

Fastest 1

Obstacle Track Fastest Lap: Form 1B "Gravity Controllers" (1 minute 13 seconds)

Fastest 2

Program Sustainability

Curriculum Integration

Incorporating RC car engineering into the formal STEAM curriculum as a core interdisciplinary learning project, providing the same learning opportunities for new Form 1 students each year.

Advanced Development

  • Form 2 Advanced Class - Introducing AI control and autonomous driving technology
  • Form 3 Research Group - Participating in inter-school STEAM competitions
  • Form 4 Internship Program - Collaborating with local engineering companies for internship opportunities

Community Outreach

  • Parent Workshops - Inviting parents to participate and understand STEAM education
  • Primary School Experience Camps - Providing preparatory courses for Primary 6 students
  • Community Exhibitions - Showcasing student works at technology festivals

Experience Summary & Recommendations

Success Factors

  1. Systematic Curriculum Design - Complete learning pathway from theory to practice
  2. Professional Faculty Support - Instructor team with engineering backgrounds
  3. Adequate Resource Allocation - Comprehensive equipment and material support
  4. Full School Cooperation - Active participation from administrative and teaching teams

Improvement Suggestions

  1. Increase Female Student Participation - Design more diverse learning activities
  2. Strengthen Career Connections - Invite more industry experts to share
  3. Expand Assessment Methods - Include more creativity and soft skills evaluation
  4. Build Learning Communities - Create student exchange platforms to continue learning

Promotional Value

This program successfully demonstrates how to transform complex engineering concepts into understandable and applicable learning experiences for students, providing valuable reference models for other schools implementing similar STEAM programs.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to The Mission Covenant Church Holm Glad College for their full cooperation. Group Photo

For inquiries about Meta Dot STEAM programs, please contact: enquiry@meta-dot.io

0

Overall Satisfaction Rating

School/Organization

The Mission Covenant Church Holm Glad College logo

The Mission Covenant Church Holm Glad College

"Today we witnessed students transform from 'parts assemblers' to 'track strategists'. This emergence of engineering thinking is more precious than any trophy. Our school has decided to make this challenge competition an annual flagship activity, allowing the STEAM gene to continue growing at Holm Glad!"

Meta Dot Limited

Transforming educationthrough STEAM.

At Meta Dot, we're revolutionizing STEAM education through innovative programs in AI, robotics, and environmental science. We have designed over 30+ courses for primary and secondary schools, focusing on our four core themes. Explore our success stories and see how we're shaping the future of learning.

Meta Dot Logo
© 2025 All rights reserved.